18. CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR (Russo,
2016)
In “Introduction to the Documentary,”
film theorist Bill Nichols discusses the power of the “indexical
whammy” in non-fiction filmmaking. To grossly oversimplify, Nichols
argues that when we watch film footage that we recognize to be linked
(indexed) to real events we react differently than when we watch
footage we recognize to be make-believe. We may feel horror or
sympathy while watching news coverage of a real tornado ripping
through a real town, but even if the images looked identical, we
might have fun watching that tornado shred a make-believe town in a
blockbuster film. It's not the footage itself, but the received
context that determines our experience. If we recognize it as
originating in the real world, the image carries a different and
often more potent force.
I believe something roughly analogous
to the indexical whammy can be at play when dealing with film
adaptations. A character or scene or setting very faithfully adapted
from book to screen can produce a potent reaction for a fan of the
source material: “That's how it really happened!” Y'know, for
real, in that fictional novel. There's a distinct thrill in
recognizing that moment in the movie as being linked to that “real”
source. Perhaps a more useful way to sum up the power of the
indexical whammy in this scenario is with four simple words: “They
got it right!”
The MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe)
movies have been getting it right in this manner from the beginning,
relying heavily on the real books and characters as their lodestars.
Since, in some cases, these characters have existed for more than
half a century and their personalities and mythologies have been
fleshed out in thousands of installments by hundreds of writers and
artists, there's a substantial body of pre-existing comic-book
reality to “index” to. Producer/overseer Kevin Feige has wisely
counseled the many MCU filmmakers to “get it right” as often as
possible.
For comic-book fans, this can lend the
films a special heft (whammy!) one would not expect from tales of
spandexed people who call themselves Scarlet Witch or Starlord and
fly around and shoot energy bolts at space gods. I fully understand
why non-fans would scoff at such a notion or perhaps diminish it as
fan service. Quite frankly, I'm surprised so many non-fans of the
comic books like these goofy escapist movies so much, though I'm
delighted that they do. I'm just telling you that, for a life-long
reader, that power's real and the Marvel filmmakers understand that
(unlike their not-so-distinguished competition).
I've loved most of the MCU movies (not
you, Guardians 2!) and I could have easily chosen “The Avengers”
(2012), “Black Panther” (2018), or “Avengers: Infinity War”
(2018) for this list, but I'm going with “Captain America; Civil
War” because it produced the most “They got it right!”
thrills for me of any of the movies. Also, I think this is the MCU
movie that Film Twitterati dumped on the most, persuasive evidence
that it gets it right.
When Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman)
makes his first MCU appearance in costume, the sun glinting off that
sleek costume as he prepares to spring into action, wow do they get
it right. Then they top that by introducing Spider-Man to the MCU and
within five seconds of hearing Tom Holland speak, I'm there screaming
(silently – I'm not an “out loud” kinda viewer) “Oh my God,
that's Peter Parker, just leaping off the Lee/Ditko pages right onto
the screen! That's him! They got it right!” Actually, as it turns
out, the MCU Peter Parker is way more chipper than the morose,
self-pitying wallflower of the early books, but there's no need to
get webbed up on minor details.
And oh, man, there's that beautiful,
silly airport battle, a big old messy, hyper-kinetic comic-book fight
adapted flawlessly from splash page to cinema. A dozen or so heroes
divide into factions and slam-bam-kapow into each other in different
combinations with no concern whatsoever for mass property damage, all
capped off by my favorite moment in the MCU. Teensy-tiny little
Ant-Man (Paul Rudd) presses a button on his glove and explodes into
the towering Giant-Man who's so big and strong now that he can just
reach out and pluck War Machine (Don Cheadle) out of the air with one
hand. The action stops so we can focus on the giddy look in Ant-Man's
eyes as he actually giggles loudly because he can't freaking believe
what he just did. He's laughing because being a super-hero is so damn
cool and so damn much fun, which is the primary source of pleasure in
comic books in the first place.
Those sparkling eyes are the pulsing
heart of the MCU. Face front, true believers, because they sure got
it right!
17. SILENCE (Scorsese, 2016)
Of course, even the finest of the MCU
movies can't match up to the best films of a true maestro like Martin
Scorsese. For me, “Silence” is by far Scorsese's greatest
accomplishment not just of the decade, but of the 21st
century.
I had the odd experience of finishing
Shusaku Endo's 1966 novel “Silence” a week before I read the
first announcement of Scorsese's planned adaptation. I struggled to
imagine how even Scorsese could translate this story for the big
screen (I was also unaware of Masahiro Shinoda's 1971 film
adaptation, which I still haven't seen). A tale of Jesuit priests in
Japan persecuted for their religion is one thing, but how do you
express on film that ineffable moment when a man makes not a
sacrifice FOR his faith, but a sacrifice OF his faith as the most
Christian act?
Heavy narration would seem the most
obvious choice to provide access to characters' interior life and
Scorsese employs a little of that, but he's more interested in
situating the viewer in a devotional space, one of both distance and
powerful tactile evocations (mud and wind and water). Scorsese's
greatest act of faith is believing in an audience that has the
patience to go on such a journey, and that may be the most inspiring
aspect of this stark, rigorous work. In a film industry increasingly
built around tent-pole properties, test screenings and
big-data-refined pandering, Scorsese trusts that you'll meet him in
his terms and that you might even choose to do so at the multiplex.
He's had fifty-plus years to build up the justified confidence to
make such a gamble, but at a time when my own commitment to the
cinema isn't as unwavering as it once was, I'm moved by his gesture.
I was perhaps slower on the uptake than
some other cinephiles, but “Silence” was the movie that
solidified my belief that Adam Driver may be the most compelling
actor of his generation. I don't intend to slight the film's lead,
Andrew Garfield, who is phenomenal in a trying role, but Driver's
face is the image that lingers in my memory the most, a face that I
think could pull me into any time period or milieu from working-class
Paterson, NJ to the 17th century to long, long ago in a
galaxy far away. Need a convincing face for your upcoming biopic
about a forgotten Italian renaissance painter? Adam Driver's your man
for that too.
No comments:
Post a Comment